1. One of the great strengths of the art school is that it cultivates a safe platform to share ideas. Yet, Central Saint Martins' new granary building evokes critical questions of the nature of the art school as both public and private. For instance each department is self contained, accessible only to the students of the course. Is this a help or a hindrance to the students creative practice?

2. Have we moved from art as education to education as art?

3. How far can Central Saint Martins survive on its brand alone?

4. To what extent does the notion of Central Saint Martins legacy lend itself to the students?

5. What is the role of creativity, knowledge and subjectivity within contemporary capitalism?

6. LVMH is venturing into a partnership exercise with a public institution; is it ethical that public monies are being used to bolster the LVMH conglomerate?

7. Does CSM represent the hub of the London Art School today?

8. How is interdisciplinary studies located within the canonical models of art education?

9. How far is holistic marking a successful model?

10. Is it ethical for an art institution to push a certain course to the forefront of its identity for commercial purposes?